🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume nuclear talks with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue produced results, and revealed recent overtures had originated from go-betweens to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to access bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more powerful in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with the American leader asserting the sites had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations used their privilege to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives asserted three times they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iranian officials said the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if talks reopen.

The American leader last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of inactivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Position

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be resolved by military means. He stated the assaults started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making confidence difficult to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Answer

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their will during the talks. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the ultimate solution to address disagreements, but its requirements, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the equivalent approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but were unable to break. The nation of Iran have grown stronger, more united, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the wake of this invasion."